Bosco v. Boston Store

Appellate Court of Illinois

Bosco v. Boston Store

195 Ill. App. 133

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 6, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,884

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 195 Ill. App. 133 (Bosco v. Boston Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bosco v. Boston Store, 195 Ill. App. 133 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Negligence, § 186*—when evidence sufficient to make prima facie case. In an action to recover for personal injuries caused by being struck by an auto-truck alleged to be owned and controlled by defendant, where defendant’s pleadings put in issue the fact of such ownership and control by it, such possession and control by defendant held proved prima facie by evidence showing that the name of defendant was painted on the outside of such truck. 2. Negligence, § 165*—when evidence admissible to show ownership of vehicle causing injury. In an action to recover for personal injuries caused by being struck by an auto-truck, where defendant’s pleadings put in issue the ownership and control of the truck and the control of the servant operating it at the time of the accident, held error to exclude evidence that such truck was in fact not owned and operated by defendant at the time of the accident, and was owned and operated by another under contract with defendant, and that the servant operating such truck at such time was the servant of such other person, as it was competent for defendant to show such facts as tending to sustain its pleadings and exonerate it from liability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Negligence, § 186*—when evidence sufficient to make prima facie case. In an action to recover for personal injuries caused by being struck by an auto-truck alleged to be owned and controlled by defendant, where defendant’s pleadings put in issue the fact of such ownership and control by it, such possession and control by defendant held proved prima facie by evidence showing that the name of defendant was painted on the outside of such truck. 2. Negligence, § 165*—when evidence admissible to show ownership of vehicle causing injury. In an action to recover for personal injuries caused by being struck by an auto-truck, where defendant’s pleadings put in issue the ownership and control of the truck and the control of the servant operating it at the time of the accident, held error to exclude evidence that such truck was in fact not owned and operated by defendant at the time of the accident, and was owned and operated by another under contract with defendant, and that the servant operating such truck at such time was the servant of such other person, as it was competent for defendant to show such facts as tending to sustain its pleadings and exonerate it from liability.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosco-v-boston-store-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack