Bos v. Bos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bos v. Bos

543 So. 2d 445, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1283, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 1989 WL 53345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 1989

DocketNo. 87-2869

StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 445 (Bos v. Bos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bos v. Bos, 543 So. 2d 445, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1283, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 1989 WL 53345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the amended final judgment that denied the petition for enforcement of child support and alimony incurred subsequent to August 31, 1979. However, it appears that the trial judge was not afforded the opportunity to consider an order of clarification by the New [446]*446Jersey trial court of the judgment entered in New Jersey. The amended final judgment in this case was founded upon the findings reached in the New Jersey judgment.

Therefore, we strike the final provision in the amended final judgment, which provides that the Florida judgment of August 31, 1979, has not been satisfied, and remand this cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the New Jersey judgment conclusively resolved whether the 1979 Florida judgment has, in fact, been satisfied. The effect, if any, of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, or concepts of full faith and credit, on the enforcement of the 1979 judgment may then be determined.

Affirmed in part, stricken in part, and remanded.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE, JJ., and POLEN, MARK E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the amended final judgment that denied the petition for enforcement of child support and alimony incurred subsequent to August 31, 1979. However, it appears that the trial judge was not afforded the opportunity to consider an order of clarification by the New [446]*446Jersey trial court of the judgment entered in New Jersey. The amended final judgment in this case was founded upon the findings reached in the New Jersey judgment.

Therefore, we strike the final provision in the amended final judgment, which provides that the Florida judgment of August 31, 1979, has not been satisfied, and remand this cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the New Jersey judgment conclusively resolved whether the 1979 Florida judgment has, in fact, been satisfied. The effect, if any, of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, or concepts of full faith and credit, on the enforcement of the 1979 judgment may then be determined.

Affirmed in part, stricken in part, and remanded.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE, JJ., and POLEN, MARK E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 So. 2d 445, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1283, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 1989 WL 53345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bos-v-bos-fladistctapp-1989.