Bory v. State

126 So. 3d 266, 2010 WL 3766726, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14493
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2010
DocketNo. 3D10-1696
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 So. 3d 266 (Bory v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bory v. State, 126 So. 3d 266, 2010 WL 3766726, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gilberto Bory appeals the denial of his motion, which among other things, requested to commence speedy trial. Because this is not an appealable order, we treat the notice of appeal and initial brief as a petition for writ of prohibition, and deny the petition. See Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.191(e) (requiring that a defendant be within state jurisdiction before he or she may demand speedy trial); Schuty v. State, 281 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973) (treating appeal from denial of discharge on speedy trial grounds as writ of prohibition).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klein v. State
237 So. 3d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 3d 266, 2010 WL 3766726, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bory-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.