Borum v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Borum v. State

848 So. 2d 342, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6374, 2002 WL 950980

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2002

DocketNo. 2D02-829

StatusPublished

This text of 848 So. 2d 342 (Borum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borum v. State, 848 So. 2d 342, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6374, 2002 WL 950980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Derrek Borum appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Although the trial court incorrectly denied the motion as successive, we affirm the denial because Bo-rum did not attach a copy of the detainer to his motion. Borum may file another rule 3.800(a) motion with a copy of his detainer attached, and it shall not be considered successive by the trial court.

GREEN, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Derrek Borum appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Although the trial court incorrectly denied the motion as successive, we affirm the denial because Bo-rum did not attach a copy of the detainer to his motion. Borum may file another rule 3.800(a) motion with a copy of his detainer attached, and it shall not be considered successive by the trial court.

GREEN, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 So. 2d 342, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6374, 2002 WL 950980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borum-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.