Borukhova v. Social Security Administration

97 F. App'x 57
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 2004
Docket03-3055
StatusUnpublished

This text of 97 F. App'x 57 (Borukhova v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borukhova v. Social Security Administration, 97 F. App'x 57 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Liya Borukhova appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her action against the Social Security Administration for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the record de novo, see United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir.1998) (standard of review), and conclude that Borukhova’s request for agency reconsideration of her disability status was still pending when she filed the instant complaint. Thus, the district court’s dismissal was proper. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1400(a); Rowden v. Warden, 89 F.3d 536, 537-38 (8th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dico, Incorporated
136 F.3d 572 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. App'x 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borukhova-v-social-security-administration-ca8-2004.