Borukhova v. Social Security Administration

97 F. App'x 57
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 11, 2004·No. 03-3055·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Liya Borukhova appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her action against the Social Security Administration for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the record de novo, see United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir.1998) (standard of review), and conclude that Borukhova’s request for agency reconsideration of her disability status was still pending when she filed the instant complaint. Thus, the district court’s dismissal was proper. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1400(a); Rowden v. Warden, 89 F.3d 536, 537-38 (8th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borukhova v. Social Security Administration, 97 F. App'x 57 (8th Cir. 2004).

97 F. App'x 57 (Borukhova v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dico, Incorporated
136 F.3d 572 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)