Borton v. Brines-Chase Co.
34 A. 597, 175 Pa. 209, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1237
Opinion
We are satisfied that the controlling questions in this case were rightly decided by the learned president of the court below, .and we are quite content to affirm the decree on his opinion. There appears to be nothing in the record that would justify us •in sustaining any of the specifications of error. ■
Decree affirmed on the opinion of the learned president of the court below, and appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borton v. Brines-Chase Co., 34 A. 597, 175 Pa. 209, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1237 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 597 (Borton v. Brines-Chase Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington-Alaska Bank v. Dexter Horton Nat. Bank
263 F. 304 (Ninth Circuit, 1920)
Nathan v. Lee
43 L.R.A. 820 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)