Bortolamedi v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 17, 2019·No. 2:17-cv-01473·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Jacquelynn Bortolamedi, Case No. 2:17-cv-01473-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff v. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation and Remanding Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of for Further Proceedings 6 Social Security Administration, [ECF Nos.13, 18, 25] 7 Defendant 8 9 Plaintiff Jacquelynn Bortolamedi brings this action to challenge the Social Security 10 Commissioner’s denial of herrequest for disability-insurance benefits under Titles IIand XVIof 11 the Social Security Act. The magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and 12 recommends1 that I grant in part and deny in part Bortolamedi’s motion for judgment on the 13 pleadings2; remand this case for further proceedings regarding Drs. Hodde, Austin, and Madow’s 14 opinions andthe vocational expert’s testimony; and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion to 15 affirm.3 The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objectionor any 16 request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report 17 and recommendation unless objections are filed.”4 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 19 [ECF No. 25] is ADOPTEDin full; 20 21 1 ECF No. 25. 22 2 ECF No. 13. 3 ECF No. 18. 23 4 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for judgment on the pleadings 2|| [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in PART, consistent with the report and recommendation [ECF No. 25], and the Commissioner’ cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 18] is DENIED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings regarding Drs. Hodde, Austin, Madow’s opinions and the vocational expert’s testimony. 6 The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. 8 Dated: September 17, 2019 : (Bom U.S. District Judge/Jennifer A. Dorsey 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bortolamedi v. Berryhill, (D. Nev. 2019).

Bortolamedi v. Berryhill (Bortolamedi v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)