Bortis v. Garrison
This text of 37 F. App'x 331 (Bortis v. Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Moise Bortis and Marius Bortis appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying as untimely their motion to reopen the time to appeal filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We conclude that the BAP properly denied the Rule 4(a)(6) motion as untimely. See Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell PC (In re Stein), 197 F.3d 421, 425 (9th Cir.1999).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F. App'x 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bortis-v-garrison-ca9-2002.