Home/Ninth Circuit/Bortis v. Garrison

Bortis v. Garrison

37 F. App'x 331
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2002·No. No. 01-35576; BAP No. WW-98-1525-PMcMe·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM**

Moise Bortis and Marius Bortis appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying as untimely their motion to reopen the time to appeal filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We conclude that the BAP properly denied the Rule 4(a)(6) motion as untimely. See Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell PC (In re Stein), 197 F.3d 421, 425 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bortis v. Garrison, 37 F. App'x 331 (9th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 331 (Bortis v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re: Alexander v. Stein, Debtor. John Mitchell, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Alexander Stein v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation Eric H. Vetterlein Burt & Gordon Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation Robert G. Burt Andrea L. Bushnell Burt & Vetterlein Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation, and Mark A. Gordon, in Re: Alexander v. Stein, Debtor. John Mitchell, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Alexander Stein v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation Burt & Gordon Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation Robert G. Burt Burt & Vetterlein Pc, an Oregon Professional Corporation, and Eric H. Vetterlein Mark A. Gordon Andrea L. Bushnell
197 F.3d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)