Borthwick v. Skurzynski
57 A.2d 216, 141 N.J. Eq. 363, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 636
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported at 139 N. J. Eq. 520.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, JJ. 11.
For reversal — -Heher, Schettino, JJ, 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borthwick v. Skurzynski, 57 A.2d 216, 141 N.J. Eq. 363, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. 1948).
57 A.2d 216 (Borthwick v. Skurzynski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pagano v. United Jersey Bank
670 A.2d 509 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Foster v. Reiss
112 A.2d 553 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
95 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Hoey v. Dell
71 A.2d 394 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Hinchliffe v. Kastner
65 A.2d 96 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)