Borthwick v. Skurzynski

57 A.2d 216, 141 N.J. Eq. 363, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 636
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 57 A.2d 216 (Borthwick v. Skurzynski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borthwick v. Skurzynski, 57 A.2d 216, 141 N.J. Eq. 363, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported at 139 N. J. Eq. 520.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -Heher, Schettino, JJ, 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pagano v. United Jersey Bank
670 A.2d 509 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Foster v. Reiss
112 A.2d 553 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
95 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Hoey v. Dell
71 A.2d 394 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Hinchliffe v. Kastner
65 A.2d 96 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 216, 141 N.J. Eq. 363, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borthwick-v-skurzynski-nj-1948.