Bortel v. State
710 So. 2d 1381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7185, 1998 WL 314884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bortel v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 743 So. 2d 595 →
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to continue his sentencing hearing. We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to withdraw his plea under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Pritchard v. State, 702 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bortel v. State, 710 So. 2d 1381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7185, 1998 WL 314884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
710 So. 2d 1381 (Bortel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pritchard v. State
702 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)