Bortas v. Bortas
This text of 182 Misc. 759 (Bortas v. Bortas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit of service of the motion papers states that the person making the service knew the identity of the defendant by reason of a photograph furnished him by plaintiff and the pointing out of the defendant to him by plaintiff. The affidavit also states that the person served admitted that he was the defendant. It is obvious that the process server had no personal knowledge as to whether the person served was or was not the defendant. The identification by the plaintiff in a matrimonial action is not enough.
Motion is accordingly denied but without prejudice to a renewal on proper papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 Misc. 759, 49 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bortas-v-bortas-nysupct-1944.