Borson v. Lisenby

Supreme Court of Florida

Borson v. Lisenby

156 So. 10, 115 Fla. 333

DecidedApril 4, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 10 (Borson v. Lisenby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borson v. Lisenby, 156 So. 10, 115 Fla. 333 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Appeal here is to review two interlocutory orders made after the entry of final decree. The appeal brings for review only those two orders.

To reverse the decree we must hold that it is made clearly to appear that the chancellor abused judicial discretion in making and entering orders and decrees complained of and as we cannot reach such conclusion, the decree should be and the same is hereby affirmed. So ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal here is to review two interlocutory orders made after the entry of final decree. The appeal brings for review only those two orders.

To reverse the decree we must hold that it is made clearly to appear that the chancellor abused judicial discretion in making and entering orders and decrees complained of and as we cannot reach such conclusion, the decree should be and the same is hereby affirmed. So ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 10, 115 Fla. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borson-v-lisenby-fla-1934.