Borrone v. Moseley Bros

137 S.W. 531, 143 Ky. 812, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 514
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 24, 1911·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Motion sustained.

When by the final judgment in an action an injunction is granted, and the circuit court makes no order suspending the injunction pending the appeal, the injunction is not suspended by the execution of a supersedeas bond and the taking out of a supersedeas. And after the [813] twenty days allowed by section 747 of the Code for that purpose has expired, this court is without power to suspend'the injunction pending the appeal by allowing a bond to be executed by. appellant. The motion to discharge the supersedeas so far as it suspends the injunction is sustained. Section 747 applies in all cases where 'an injunction is granted by a final judgment, although there has been no preliminary injunction, and the only way to obtain a supersedeas of such an injunction is that pointed out in section 747 of the Code.

Motion to discharge supersedeas sustained'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borrone v. Moseley Bros, 137 S.W. 531, 143 Ky. 812, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 514 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).

137 S.W. 531 (Borrone v. Moseley Bros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tabor v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Peterson
199 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1947)
Cox v. Jones
235 S.W. 365 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Stratton & Terstegge Co. v. Meriwether
144 S.W. 1083 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Barrone v. Moseley Bros.
137 S.W. 1048 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1911)