Borrero v. New York City Department of Correction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Borrero v. New York City Department of Correction

197 A.D.2d 418, 602 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 418 (Borrero v. New York City Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borrero v. New York City Department of Correction, 197 A.D.2d 418, 602 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.) entered June 2, 1992, which dismissed petitioner’s petition for reinstatement as a correction officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, subsequent to his resignation, seeks reinstatement to his position as a probationary correction officer. However, since the rules and regulations of the City Personnel Director do not provide for reinstatement of a probationary employee, petitioner has not established his entitlement to judicial review of respondent’s refusal to reinstate him (Matter of Spurling v Police Dept., 49 AD2d 823, appeal dismissed 38 NY2d 826). Were we to review respondent’s determination, we would find that in light of the confidential review of petitioner’s personnel history that was undertaken, petitioner did not establish that his request was denied in bad faith. Petitioner’s remaining arguments were not raised before the IAS Court and cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal (see, Matter of Belgrave v Ward, 72 AD2d 898). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.) entered June 2, 1992, which dismissed petitioner’s petition for reinstatement as a correction officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, subsequent to his resignation, seeks reinstatement to his position as a probationary correction officer. However, since the rules and regulations of the City Personnel Director do not provide for reinstatement of a probationary employee, petitioner has not established his entitlement to judicial review of respondent’s refusal to reinstate him (Matter of Spurling v Police Dept., 49 AD2d 823, appeal dismissed 38 NY2d 826). Were we to review respondent’s determination, we would find that in light of the confidential review of petitioner’s personnel history that was undertaken, petitioner did not establish that his request was denied in bad faith. Petitioner’s remaining arguments were not raised before the IAS Court and cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal (see, Matter of Belgrave v Ward, 72 AD2d 898). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 418, 602 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borrero-v-new-york-city-department-of-correction-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack