Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.

926 A.2d 665, 282 Conn. 925, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 277
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 5, 2007
DocketSC 17917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 926 A.2d 665 (Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC., 926 A.2d 665, 282 Conn. 925, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 277 (Colo. 2007).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 680 (AC 25905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926 Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17917. J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Gregory J. Kycia, in opposition.

“Where the defendant contractor admitted by answer and affirmatively alleged by counterclaim that it had contracted to install a septic system to the architect’s specifications, could the trial court properly disregard those admissions or was the trial court required to consider the evidence in light of those admissions?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borrelli v. H & H Contracting, Inc.
940 A.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
926 A.2d 665, 282 Conn. 925, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borrelli-v-h-and-h-contracting-inc-conn-2007.