Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.

926 A.2d 665, 282 Conn. 925, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 277

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 5, 2007·No. SC 17917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 680 (AC 25905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926 Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17917. J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Gregory J. Kycia, in opposition.

“Where the defendant contractor admitted by answer and affirmatively alleged by counterclaim that it had contracted to install a septic system to the architect’s specifications, could the trial court properly disregard those admissions or was the trial court required to consider the evidence in light of those admissions?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 680 (AC 25905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926 Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17917. J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Gregory J. Kycia, in opposition.

“Where the defendant contractor admitted by answer and affirmatively alleged by counterclaim that it had contracted to install a septic system to the architect’s specifications, could the trial court properly disregard those admissions or was the trial court required to consider the evidence in light of those admissions?”

Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC., 926 A.2d 665, 282 Conn. 925, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 277 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

926 A.2d 665 (Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related