Borrego v. State

80 So. 3d 411, 2012 WL 414004, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1905
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2245·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Borrego, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the postconviction court correctly determined that his motion was untimely, we affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868, 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed; question certified.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borrego v. State, 80 So. 3d 411, 2012 WL 414004, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

80 So. 3d 411 (Borrego v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)