Borrego v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Borrego v. State

80 So. 3d 411, 2012 WL 414004, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 2012

DocketNo. 2D11-2245

StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 3d 411 (Borrego v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borrego v. State, 80 So. 3d 411, 2012 WL 414004, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Borrego, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the postconviction court correctly determined that his motion was untimely, we affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868, 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed; question certified.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Borrego, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the postconviction court correctly determined that his motion was untimely, we affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868, 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed; question certified.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 3d 411, 2012 WL 414004, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borrego-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack