Borregaard Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Borregaard Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 296

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 30, 1959

DocketNo. 63215; protests 324544-K and 324589-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 296 (Borregaard Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borregaard Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 296 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C.D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C.D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Cust. Ct. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borregaard-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack