Borregaard Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Borregaard Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 296

United States Customs Court·Decided June 30, 1959·No. No. 63215; protests 324544-K and 324589-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C.D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C.D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Borregaard Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 296 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

43 Cust. Ct. 296 (Borregaard Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related