Borowy v. McKinlay

Michigan Court of Appeals

Borowy v. McKinlay

197 N.W.2d 828, 39 Mich. App. 643, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1514

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 31, 1972

DocketDocket No. 12895

StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.W.2d 828 (Borowy v. McKinlay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borowy v. McKinlay, 197 N.W.2d 828, 39 Mich. App. 643, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1514 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff brought a defamation action for an alleged libel contained in pleadings filed by defendant in another action. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis that they were privileged; they having been made in the course of judicial proceedings.

An examination of the briefs and record discloses no error in the trial court’s ruling.

Affirmed on the basis of Sanders v Leeson Air Conditioning Corporation, 362 Mich 692 (1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff brought a defamation action for an alleged libel contained in pleadings filed by defendant in another action. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis that they were privileged; they having been made in the course of judicial proceedings.

An examination of the briefs and record discloses no error in the trial court’s ruling.

Affirmed on the basis of Sanders v Leeson Air Conditioning Corporation, 362 Mich 692 (1961).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 N.W.2d 828, 39 Mich. App. 643, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borowy-v-mckinlay-michctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack