Borowski v. Polinske

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2107

MATTHEW BOROWSKI; CARIANNE BOROWSKI,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

TERESA POLINSKE, in her official and individual capacities; STEVEN D. EPPLE, in his official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00197-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: February 18, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Borowski, Carianne Borowski, Appellants Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK, KITTS & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Matthew and Carianne Borowski appeal a district

court’s order granting Detective Stephen D. Epple’s and

Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Teresa Polinske’s motions to

dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failing to state a

claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.

See Borowski v. Polinske, No. 1:10-cv-00197-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va.

filed Aug. 24, 2010; entered Aug. 25, 2010). We deny the

Borowskis’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED