Borowiak v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Borowiak v. International Railway Co.

170 A.D. 934, 154 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D. 934 (Borowiak v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borowiak v. International Railway Co., 170 A.D. 934, 154 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the court improperly granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case; that the evidence presented questions of fact, both as to the defendant’s negligence in operating its car and as to plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence, which should have been submitted to the jury. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the court improperly granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case; that the evidence presented questions of fact, both as to the defendant’s negligence in operating its car and as to plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence, which should have been submitted to the jury. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D. 934, 154 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borowiak-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1915.