Borough of Youngsville v. Siggins

1 A. 736, 110 Pa. 291, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 5, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 A. 736 (Borough of Youngsville v. Siggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borough of Youngsville v. Siggins, 1 A. 736, 110 Pa. 291, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 419 (Pa. 1885).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed October 5th, 1885.

Pee Curiam.

This claim was made under the General Borough Law of 3d April, 1851. The Act makes it recoverable as claims are by law recoverable under the provisions of the law relative to mechanics’ liens; yet we understand that to mean by scire facias. After specifying what shall be set forth in the statement, the Act expressly declares it shall “be filed within thirty days after such expense shall have been incurred.” This claim was not filed within the time specified. The learned judge correctly held that this time was an essential preliminary to the collection of the claim under the Act, and committed no error in striking off the lien.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. City of Jacksonville
160 So. 15 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Condon v. City of Chicago
94 N.E. 976 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A. 736, 110 Pa. 291, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-youngsville-v-siggins-pa-1885.