Borough of Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals
187 A. 35, 117 N.J.L. 114, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 317
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Lloyd, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 6.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 187 A. 35, 117 N.J.L. 114, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 317 (N.J. 1936).
187 A. 35 (Borough of Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hackensack Water Company v. Borough of Old Tappan
390 A.2d 122 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1978)
Borough of Wanaque v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission
26 A.2d 569 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1942)
Central R. Co. v. Martin
30 F. Supp. 41 (D. New Jersey, 1939)