Borough of Runnemede v. New Jersey Water Co.

123 N.J.L. 383
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 22, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.J.L. 383 (Borough of Runnemede v. New Jersey Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borough of Runnemede v. New Jersey Water Co., 123 N.J.L. 383 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

' The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons' expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Palmer in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Eaeeerty, Hague, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 N.J.L. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-runnemede-v-new-jersey-water-co-nj-1939.