Borough of Longport v. Max & Sarah Bamberger Seashore Home
102 A. 633, 91 N.J.L. 330, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 262
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Parker, Williams, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of Longport v. Max & Sarah Bamberger Seashore Home, 102 A. 633, 91 N.J.L. 330, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 262 (N.J. 1917).
102 A. 633 (Borough of Longport v. Max & Sarah Bamberger Seashore Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Community Options Enterprises, Inc. V.Evesham Township
New Jersey Tax Court, 2017
Grace & Peace Fellowship Church, Inc. v. Cranford Township
4 N.J. Tax 391 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1982)
Holy Cross Precious Zion Glorious Church of God v. Trenton City
2 N.J. Tax 352 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)
First Baptist Church v. County of Los Angeles
248 P.2d 101 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Village of Hibbing v. Commissioner of Taxation
14 N.W.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Coward
110 F.2d 725 (Third Circuit, 1940)