Borough of Linden v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Borough of Linden v. Maryland Casualty Co.

130 A. 922, 3 N.J. Misc. 1041, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 43

DecidedOctober 19, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A. 922 (Borough of Linden v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borough of Linden v. Maryland Casualty Co., 130 A. 922, 3 N.J. Misc. 1041, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 43 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Pek Cuhiam.

This was a suit upon a bond given to secure the faithful performance of a sewer construction contract.

Plaintiff has a judgment upon verdict for $1,347.63, and defendant has a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, assigning several reasons therefor, our examination of which leads us to the conclusion that the verdict should not be disturbed.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pek Cuhiam.

This was a suit upon a bond given to secure the faithful performance of a sewer construction contract.

Plaintiff has a judgment upon verdict for $1,347.63, and defendant has a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, assigning several reasons therefor, our examination of which leads us to the conclusion that the verdict should not be disturbed.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A. 922, 3 N.J. Misc. 1041, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-linden-v-maryland-casualty-co-nj-1925.