Borough of Easton v. Rinek
9 A. 63, 116 Pa. 1, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 357
Opinion
No question arises heie between the vendor and vendee of land fronting on a street. The sole claim is by the owner of the land against the municipality for damages which he sustained by its taking of his land for a street. No damages were ■sustained until the street was opened.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of Easton v. Rinek, 9 A. 63, 116 Pa. 1, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 357 (Pa. 1887).
9 A. 63 (Borough of Easton v. Rinek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opening of Second Avenue in the Borough of Conshohocken
7 Pa. Super. 55 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Bellefield Avenue
2 Pa. Super. 148 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
In re Opening of Brooklyn Street
12 A. 664 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)