Borough of Easton v. Rinek
9 A. 63, 116 Pa. 1, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 357
This text of 9 A. 63 (Borough of Easton v. Rinek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Borough of Easton v. Rinek, 9 A. 63, 116 Pa. 1, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 357 (Pa. 1887).
Opinion
No question arises heie between the vendor and vendee of land fronting on a street. The sole claim is by the owner of the land against the municipality for damages which he sustained by its taking of his land for a street. No damages were ■sustained until the street was opened.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Opening of Second Avenue in the Borough of Conshohocken
7 Pa. Super. 55 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Bellefield Avenue
2 Pa. Super. 148 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
In re Opening of Brooklyn Street
12 A. 664 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 A. 63, 116 Pa. 1, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-easton-v-rinek-pa-1887.