Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 587, 30 Vroom 587, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 1
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Lippincott, Magie, Barkalow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township, 39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 587, 30 Vroom 587, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 1 (N.J. 1896).
39 A. 1113 (Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.