Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 587, 30 Vroom 587, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 1
This text of 39 A. 1113 (Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Borough of East Newark v. Kearney Township, 39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 587, 30 Vroom 587, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 1 (N.J. 1896).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Lippincott, Magie, Barkalow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 587, 30 Vroom 587, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-east-newark-v-kearney-township-nj-1896.