Borough of Carlisle v. Carlisle Gas & Water Co.
This text of 4 A. 179 (Borough of Carlisle v. Carlisle Gas & Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the facts found, this judgment is correct. The fire plugs were not put in under any contract which precluded the company from imposing reasonable charges for the use of the water. The fact that the borough was permitted' to use it gratuitously for several years did not make such permission ir revocable. The right to change the rates was expressly reserved by rule 13 of the company. The borough had knowledge of that right. It is a large stockholder in the company and is entitled to appoint one third of the managers thereof. This right it exercises annually. It was duly notified of the changes and of the annual rates imposed on it. The rate is not unreasonable. The borough has not abandoned the fire plugs, nor has it discontinued the use of the water by the fire companies whenever necessary. We concur in the conclusion of the court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A. 179, 2 Sadler 459, 18 Week. No. 59, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-carlisle-v-carlisle-gas-water-co-pa-1886.