Borough of Bradley Beach v. Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co.

52 A. 231, 68 N.J.L. 73, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 84
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 9, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The plaintiff having demurred, we have examined the pleadings sufficiently to see that the narr. itself is bad in that the time of the material traversable facts is not stated, viz., the time at which the defendant ought to have performed and the time at which it failed to perform, and the time at which the plaintiff’s right of action arose. These allegations are not only required by the rules of correct pleading, but, as a case into which reasonable time enters, they are of the essence of the declaration. Not that the plaintiff must prove the actual time sued or fail, but that it may appear what relation time bore to the alleged breach of duty, and that, at least by the plaintiff’s own showing, the cause of action had accrued before the commencement of the suit. Chit. Pl. 251; Gould Pl., § 63.

Judgment is given for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borough of Bradley Beach v. Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co., 52 A. 231, 68 N.J.L. 73, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 84 (N.J. 1902).

52 A. 231 (Borough of Bradley Beach v. Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitelaw v. Vallance
198 P. 449 (Montana Supreme Court, 1921)
Hart-Parr Co. v. Paine
199 S.W. 822 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)