Borough of Belmar v. Levinsohn

102 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 340, 3 Stock. 340, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 494
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 19, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 1052 (Borough of Belmar v. Levinsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borough of Belmar v. Levinsohn, 102 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 340, 3 Stock. 340, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 494 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree in this cause will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam filed in the similar case of Heyniger v. Levinsohn, decided at the present term and published in 88 N. J. Eq. 341.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams — 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 340, 3 Stock. 340, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-belmar-v-levinsohn-nj-1917.