Borough Hall Steam Laundry, Inc. v. Sawaff

226 A.D. 673
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order as amended, and order upon reargument, denying motion for injunction pendente lite., reversed upon the law; with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Respondent contends that he was wrongfully discharged, but that is a question to be determined upon the trial. Concededly, he now is violating his contract by engaging in the laundry business in the Bay Ridge section. Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs to the extent of restraining defendant from dealing with plaintiff’s customers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borough Hall Steam Laundry, Inc. v. Sawaff, 226 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

226 A.D. 673 (Borough Hall Steam Laundry, Inc. v. Sawaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puritan Steam Laundry Co. v. Robbins
234 A.D. 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)