Borochorr v. National Casualty Co.

39 Ga. App. 319
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1929
Docket18982
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 39 Ga. App. 319 (Borochorr v. National Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borochorr v. National Casualty Co., 39 Ga. App. 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This being a suit instituted in the municipal court of Atlanta by the insured under an accident-insurance policy, in which a verdict for the plaintiff was rendered in a certain amount including attorney’s fees recoverable under § 2549 of the Civil Code of 1910, and was affirmed by the appellate division of that court, and the verdict and judgment not being demanded as a matter of law, the judgment of the judge of the superior court, sustaining a certiorari brought by the defendant and granting a first new trial, will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Casualty Co. v. Borochoff
165 S.E. 905 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Macon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
154 S.E. 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Ga. App. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borochorr-v-national-casualty-co-gactapp-1929.