Boro Motors Corp. v. Century Motor Sales Corp.
This text of 9 A.D.2d 894 (Boro Motors Corp. v. Century Motor Sales Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action against a corporation to recover damages for alleged breach of contract (1st cause of action) and against officers thereof to recover damages for conspiring to induce said breach (2d cause of action). The appeal is from an order (1) denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) denying the corporate appellant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action on the ground that the contract attached to the amended complaint, upon which said cause of action is founded, is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds (Rules Civ. Prac., .rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 894, 195 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boro-motors-corp-v-century-motor-sales-corp-nyappdiv-1959.