Boro Hall Corp. v. Impellitteri

283 A.D. 889, 130 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5657
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1954·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to restrain the defendant municipality from clearing and rehabilitating a slum [890]*890area as a project and for other relief, plaintiffs appeal from orders which deny their motion for a temporary injunction and which grant cross motions of the defendants and the interveners pursuant to rules 106, 112, and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice dismissing the complaint, and from the judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint. Orders and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Kashel v. Impellitteri (306 N. Y. 73). Present

— Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boro Hall Corp. v. Impellitteri, 283 A.D. 889, 130 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

283 A.D. 889 (Boro Hall Corp. v. Impellitteri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kintzele v. City of St. Louis
347 S.W.2d 695 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1961)
Chelcy v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority
24 Misc. 2d 598 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
64th St. Residences, Inc. v. City of New York
10 Misc. 2d 841 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)