Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Boro Developers, Inc. v. Bonovitacola Electric Contractor, Inc.

Boro Developers, Inc. v. Bonovitacola Electric Contractor, Inc.

933 A.2d 646
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 17, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 933 A.2d 646 (Boro Developers, Inc. v. Bonovitacola Electric Contractor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boro Developers, Inc. v. Bonovitacola Electric Contractor, Inc., 933 A.2d 646 (Pa. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Petition of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. It is also ordered that this case be REMANDED to the Superior Court to remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to VACATE its order, sustaining the preliminary objections filed by Local Union No. 654 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and transferring the action to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Pa.R.C.P. No. 1006(c)(1),(e); Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc., 589 Pa. 516, 909 A.2d 1272, 1281 (2006).

Justice SAYLOR would allow the appeal and address the matter by written opinion after briefing and argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc.
909 A.2d 1272 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 A.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boro-developers-inc-v-bonovitacola-electric-contractor-inc-pa-2007.