Bornstein v. Diskin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bornstein v. Diskin

84 N.Y.S. 248

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 248 (Bornstein v. Diskin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bornstein v. Diskin, 84 N.Y.S. 248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

It not appearing from the moving papers that the attorney for the defendant who did appear and answer was the attorney for the codefendants, or that he knew the latter had not been served, or that the case was not at issue by default, the court below properly refused to strike the case from its calendar, and its order must be affirmed, with costs.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

It not appearing from the moving papers that the attorney for the defendant who did appear and answer was the attorney for the codefendants, or that he knew the latter had not been served, or that the case was not at issue by default, the court below properly refused to strike the case from its calendar, and its order must be affirmed, with costs.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornstein-v-diskin-nyappterm-1903.