Bornstein v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando
This text of 606 F.2d 114 (Bornstein v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
606 F.2d 114
CA PC 79-3872 Barbara BORNSTEIN, as Trustee for National
Indemnity Company of Omaha, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF ORLANDO, now known as Pan American
Bank of Orlando, N. A., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 75-2965.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 8, 1979.
Winifred J. Sharp, Orlando, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
Hugh M. Palmer, Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JONES, COLEMAN and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this diversity case there are no fact issues. The questions presented require the determination and application of Florida law. This Court certified the questions presented to the Supreme Court of Florida. Bornstein v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando, 5th Cir. 1977, 564 F.2d 721. The questions have been answered by the Florida court. Citizens National Bank of Orlando v. Barbara Bornstein, 1979, 374 So.2d 6. The answers given require that the judgment of the district court be and it is hereby
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 F.2d 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornstein-v-citizens-national-bank-of-orlando-ca5-1979.