Bornstein v. Bornstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bornstein v. Bornstein

703 So. 2d 518, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14374, 1998 WL 25738

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 1997·No. No. 97-3897·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept appellee’s concession that the trial court erred when, without a hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s exceptions to the general master’s report recommending the wife’s amended motion for contempt and sanctions should be granted. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); see also Kay v. Kay, 430 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the former husband’s exceptions to the general master’s report and remand this cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL and WARNER, JJ. and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We accept appellee’s concession that the trial court erred when, without a hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s exceptions to the general master’s report recommending the wife’s amended motion for contempt and sanctions should be granted. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); see also Kay v. Kay, 430 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the former husband’s exceptions to the general master’s report and remand this cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL and WARNER, JJ. and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.

Bornstein v. Bornstein, 703 So. 2d 518, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14374, 1998 WL 25738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

703 So. 2d 518 (Bornstein v. Bornstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related