Bornscheuer v. Lybco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bornscheuer v. Lybco, Inc.

33 A.D.2d 1020, 308 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1020 (Bornscheuer v. Lybco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bornscheuer v. Lybco, Inc., 33 A.D.2d 1020, 308 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to rescind a transfer of shares in the capital stock of the corporate defendant and for other relief, defendant Bornseheuer appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 15, 1969 after a nonjury trial, as (1) is in favor of plaintiff upon her first cause of action; (2) directed defendant Bornscheuer to sign the pertinent stock certificate over to plaintiff and return same to her; and (3) dismissed defendant Bornscheuer’s counterclaim. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs; plaintiff’s first cause of action dismissed; and judgment granted to defendant Bornseheuer, upon his counterclaim, that he is, and at all times in question was, the sole beneficial owner of the shares of stock in question. In our opinion, the evidence did not make out a completed gift of the corporate stock in question to plaintiff. The mere issuance of the certificate in plaintiff’s name without evidence of a donative intent on the part of appellant or of a delivery, either actual or constructive, is insufficient to constitute a gift (Matter of Hayes, 153 Misc. 233; Matter of Moran, 136 Misc. 615; Matter of Schenk, 208 Misc. 762). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to rescind a transfer of shares in the capital stock of the corporate defendant and for other relief, defendant Bornseheuer appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 15, 1969 after a nonjury trial, as (1) is in favor of plaintiff upon her first cause of action; (2) directed defendant Bornscheuer to sign the pertinent stock certificate over to plaintiff and return same to her; and (3) dismissed defendant Bornscheuer’s counterclaim. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs; plaintiff’s first cause of action dismissed; and judgment granted to defendant Bornseheuer, upon his counterclaim, that he is, and at all times in question was, the sole beneficial owner of the shares of stock in question. In our opinion, the evidence did not make out a completed gift of the corporate stock in question to plaintiff. The mere issuance of the certificate in plaintiff’s name without evidence of a donative intent on the part of appellant or of a delivery, either actual or constructive, is insufficient to constitute a gift (Matter of Hayes, 153 Misc. 233; Matter of Moran, 136 Misc. 615; Matter of Schenk, 208 Misc. 762). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1020, 308 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornscheuer-v-lybco-inc-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack