Bornhop v. Bornhop

976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 22, 1998
DocketNo. 72997
StatusPublished

This text of 976 S.W.2d 622 (Bornhop v. Bornhop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bornhop v. Bornhop, 976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop’s (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. Von-Sande, 858 S.W.2d 283, 236 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Scott
858 S.W.2d 282 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornhop-v-bornhop-moctapp-1998.