Bornhop v. Bornhop

976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1998·No. No. 72997·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop’s (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. Von-Sande, 858 S.W.2d 283, 236 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bornhop v. Bornhop, 976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

976 S.W.2d 622 (Bornhop v. Bornhop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Scott
858 S.W.2d 282 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)