Bornhop v. Bornhop
This text of 976 S.W.2d 622 (Bornhop v. Bornhop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop’s (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. Von-Sande, 858 S.W.2d 283, 236 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
976 S.W.2d 622, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1998 WL 643088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornhop-v-bornhop-moctapp-1998.