Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 745, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2360
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 31, 1967
DocketR.D. 11315; Entry No. 17496
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 745 (Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 745, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2360 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Landis, Judge:

On call of the calendar at the term of court in San Juan, P.R., on March 2, 1967, decision was reserved on defendant’s motion to dismiss this appeal for reappraisement on the ground that the appeal was untimely filed.

The official papers show that the merchandise of this appeal was appraised on September 27, 1965, at a value higher than the entered value. Without waiting for the notice of appraisement provided for [746]*746in section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1501), an appeal to reappraisement was filed-on October 12, 1965. The following day, October 13, 1965, written notice of appraisement, on Customs Form 4301, was mailed to the consignee or his agent pursuant to section 501. On authority of Wilmington Shipping Co. v. United States, 52 CCPA 89, C.A.D. 864, an appeal filed in advance of notice of appraisement under section 501 is premature and must be dismissed.

The motion is granted. This appeal to reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 745, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borneo-sumatra-trading-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.