Born v. Treworgy
This text of Born v. Treworgy (Born v. Treworgy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[ NI ERE D JUL 2 8 lQ14 Mtl STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-14-137 :JPrvv-01M-~-Ob-IL{- ROBIN T. BORN
Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION v. TO AMEND CASE CAPTION STATEOFMAINE COLIN G. TREWORGY, Trustee CumbJ?rlsni ~:>: Cl~rk'e; Office
Defendant. JUN 0 9 201~ RECEIVED This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to amend the case
caption. The court heard argument on June 3, 2014.
Background
This case began in the Cumberland County probate court. On January 8,
2014, plaintiff Robin Born filed a complaint to compel former trustee to deliver
property pursuant to 18-B M.R.S.A. § 201(3). Probate Judge Mazziotti issued an
order finding that plaintiff Born had standing to commence the action as the new
trustee of the three trusts involved in the case. Judge Mazziotti likened the case
"to the termination of an employee where an employment contract allows
termination only for just cause." (3/10/14 Order, at 6.) He found that, while
Robin became the new trustee when she unilaterally dismissed Colin Treworgy
as trustee, the court nevertheless had jurisdiction to determine whether "Robin,
as successor trustee, acted in good faith and in accordance with the purposes and
dictates of the trusts in dismissing Colin." (Id.) Put another way, the trust
documents allowed Born to dismiss Treworgy, but the court must determine
whether the dismissal was warranted. Discussion
A court is not in any way limited in declaring the rights of the parties
because of the caption in a case. See Lund ex rel. Wilbur v. Pratt, 308 A.2d 554,
557 (Me. 1973) ("The caption of a complaint constitutes no part of the statement
of the cause of action, and the rights of the parties to relief cannot be made to
depend upon what may appear in the caption of the case."). The court need not
get into the merits of the dispute at this state of the case. A fair reading of Judge
Mazziotti's order is that plaintiff Robin Born is the current trustee, unless
determined otherwise, because she exercised her rights to dismiss defendant
Colin Treworgy as trustee. 1 According! y, the court will grant plaintiff's motion.
Changing the case caption does not limit the court's ability to resolve the
dispute over whether Robin Born acted in good faith in dismissing Treworgy or
whether Colin Treworgy breached his fiduciary duties as trustee. Determining
the appropriate remedy, including whether Colin Treworgy should be reinstated
as trustee, will be resolved at the appropriate time.
The entry is:
It is ORDERED that the caption in this case is amended as follows:
ROBIN T. BORN, Trustee,
Plaintiff
v. COLIN G. TREWORGY,
Defendant.
1 Defendant argues that the Court is not bound by the Probate Judge's ruling because the case starts anew in the Superior Court. Rule 71A of the Maine Rules of Probate Procedure provides, "[a]ny order of the Probate Court entered prior to removal shall remain in force until modified by the Superior Court." M.R. Prob. P. 71A(c). At this time, the order entered in the Probate Court is still in force.
2 ~W~l~ Justice, Superior Court
Plaintiff-Dennis O'Donovan Esq Defendant-John Colby Wallace Esq
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Born v. Treworgy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/born-v-treworgy-mesuperct-2014.