Born v. Treworgy

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedJune 9, 2014
DocketCUMcv-14-137
StatusUnpublished

This text of Born v. Treworgy (Born v. Treworgy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Born v. Treworgy, (Me. Super. Ct. 2014).

Opinion

[ NI ERE D JUL 2 8 lQ14 Mtl STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-14-137 :JPrvv-01M-~-Ob-IL{- ROBIN T. BORN

Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION v. TO AMEND CASE CAPTION STATEOFMAINE COLIN G. TREWORGY, Trustee CumbJ?rlsni ~:>: Cl~rk'e; Office

Defendant. JUN 0 9 201~ RECEIVED This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to amend the case

caption. The court heard argument on June 3, 2014.

Background

This case began in the Cumberland County probate court. On January 8,

2014, plaintiff Robin Born filed a complaint to compel former trustee to deliver

property pursuant to 18-B M.R.S.A. § 201(3). Probate Judge Mazziotti issued an

order finding that plaintiff Born had standing to commence the action as the new

trustee of the three trusts involved in the case. Judge Mazziotti likened the case

"to the termination of an employee where an employment contract allows

termination only for just cause." (3/10/14 Order, at 6.) He found that, while

Robin became the new trustee when she unilaterally dismissed Colin Treworgy

as trustee, the court nevertheless had jurisdiction to determine whether "Robin,

as successor trustee, acted in good faith and in accordance with the purposes and

dictates of the trusts in dismissing Colin." (Id.) Put another way, the trust

documents allowed Born to dismiss Treworgy, but the court must determine

whether the dismissal was warranted. Discussion

A court is not in any way limited in declaring the rights of the parties

because of the caption in a case. See Lund ex rel. Wilbur v. Pratt, 308 A.2d 554,

557 (Me. 1973) ("The caption of a complaint constitutes no part of the statement

of the cause of action, and the rights of the parties to relief cannot be made to

depend upon what may appear in the caption of the case."). The court need not

get into the merits of the dispute at this state of the case. A fair reading of Judge

Mazziotti's order is that plaintiff Robin Born is the current trustee, unless

determined otherwise, because she exercised her rights to dismiss defendant

Colin Treworgy as trustee. 1 According! y, the court will grant plaintiff's motion.

Changing the case caption does not limit the court's ability to resolve the

dispute over whether Robin Born acted in good faith in dismissing Treworgy or

whether Colin Treworgy breached his fiduciary duties as trustee. Determining

the appropriate remedy, including whether Colin Treworgy should be reinstated

as trustee, will be resolved at the appropriate time.

The entry is:

It is ORDERED that the caption in this case is amended as follows:

ROBIN T. BORN, Trustee,

Plaintiff

v. COLIN G. TREWORGY,

Defendant.

1 Defendant argues that the Court is not bound by the Probate Judge's ruling because the case starts anew in the Superior Court. Rule 71A of the Maine Rules of Probate Procedure provides, "[a]ny order of the Probate Court entered prior to removal shall remain in force until modified by the Superior Court." M.R. Prob. P. 71A(c). At this time, the order entered in the Probate Court is still in force.

2 ~W~l~ Justice, Superior Court

Plaintiff-Dennis O'Donovan Esq Defendant-John Colby Wallace Esq

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lund Ex Rel. Wilbur v. Pratt
308 A.2d 554 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Born v. Treworgy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/born-v-treworgy-mesuperct-2014.