Born v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Born v. State

339 So. 2d 310, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15969

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1976

DocketNo. 76-127

StatusPublished

This text of 339 So. 2d 310 (Born v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Born v. State, 339 So. 2d 310, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15969 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction and five year sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary sexual battery.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence because the evidence was insufficient to establish the element of force and lack of consent as required by Fla.Stat. § 794.-011(5).

After carefully considering the record on appeal and briefs we have concluded that [311]*311no reversible error has been made to appear. State v. Smith, 249 So.2d 16 (Fla.1971); Fields v. State, 257 So.2d 241 (Fla.1971); Berezovsky v. State, 335 So.2d 592 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI