Born v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-10376
StatusUnknown

This text of Born v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. (Born v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Born v. Quad/Graphics, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 1/10/2 020 -------------------------------------------------------------- X DENNIS BORN and MARILYNN BORN, : individually and on behalf of all others similarly : situated, : : 19-CV-10376 (VEC) Plaintiffs, : : ORDER -against- : CONSOLIDATING : QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC., J. JOEL : QUADRACCI, and DAVID J. JONAN, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE BLOOM, individually and on behalf of : all others similarly situated, : 19-CV-11860 (VEC) : Plaintiff, : : -against- : : QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC., J. JOEL : QUADRACCI, and DAVID J. JONAN, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS the above-captioned class actions have been designated as related cases because they concern or arise from substantially the same events, see Local Business Rule 13; WHEREAS five motions to appoint lead plaintiff and approve lead plaintiff’s selection of counsel have been filed in Born, 19-CV-1-376, see Dkts. 9, 13, 19, 21, and 25—four of which also move to consolidate the above-captioned actions, see Dkts. 9, 19, 21, and 25; WHEREAS the Court finds that the above-captioned actions assert substantially the same claims under the Securities Exchange Act and related regulations; that those claims arise from the same or similar alleged materially false or misleading statements and omissions; and that the actions therefore involve common questions of law or fact, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); see e.g., In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec. & Derivative Litig., 288 F.R.D. 26, 34-35 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The above-captioned actions are consolidated into one action (the “Consolidated Action”) for all purposes. All future filings should be made in docket number 19-CV-10376. 2. Any additional submissions by any party regarding the appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel in the Consolidated Action are due no later than January 24, 2020. After a lead plaintiff and lead counsel are named, the Court will set a schedule for Lead Plaintiff to file an Amended Consolidated Complaint.

SO ORDERED. . “ Vode Ly Date: January 10, 2020 VALERIE CAPRONI New York, New York United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Facebook, Inc.
288 F.R.D. 26 (S.D. New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Born v. Quad/Graphics, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/born-v-quadgraphics-inc-nysd-2020.