Born v. King
124 N.E. 399, 71 Ind. App. 154, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 174
This text of 124 N.E. 399 (Born v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Born v. King, 124 N.E. 399, 71 Ind. App. 154, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 174 (Ind. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
— The only questions which, under the rules of this court, are presented for our consideration, and which have not been waived by appellant, require’for their determination a review of conflict^ ing evidence. Under such circumstances, the judg[155]*155ment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nicholson v. Smith
110 N.E. 1007 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 N.E. 399, 71 Ind. App. 154, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/born-v-king-indctapp-1919.