Born v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Born v. King

124 N.E. 399, 71 Ind. App. 154, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 174

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1919·No. No. 10,040·Published

Opinion

Remy, J.

— The only questions which, under the rules of this court, are presented for our consideration, and which have not been waived by appellant, require’for their determination a review of conflict^ ing evidence. Under such circumstances, the judg[155] ment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Remy, J.

— The only questions which, under the rules of this court, are presented for our consideration, and which have not been waived by appellant, require’for their determination a review of conflict^ ing evidence. Under such circumstances, the judg[155] ment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, the judgment is affirmed.

Born v. King, 124 N.E. 399, 71 Ind. App. 154, 1919 Ind. App. LEXIS 174 (Ind. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

124 N.E. 399 (Born v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related