Born Again Salvage Corp. v. Ratner

88 A.D.2d 943, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17298
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, dated July 17, 1981, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of violating certain regulations, imposed a total of $1,750 in fines and revoked its license. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board ofEduc., 34 NY2d 222). Weinstein, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Born Again Salvage Corp. v. Ratner, 88 A.D.2d 943, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

88 A.D.2d 943 (Born Again Salvage Corp. v. Ratner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Triangle Auto Body, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs
198 A.D.2d 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)