Borland v. State

158 S.W. 532, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1913·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of violating the prohibition law, and his punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the state penitentiary.

The only grounds in the motion complain of the insufficiency of the testimony. No statement of facts accompanies the record. Consequently we cannot pass on th.ose grounds of the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borland v. State, 158 S.W. 532, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 703 (Tex. 1913).

158 S.W. 532 (Borland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.