Borland v. Sharp

Connecticut Superior Court

Borland v. Sharp

1 Root 178

DecidedMarch 15, 1790

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 178 (Borland v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borland v. Sharp, 1 Root 178 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Pincite

Opinion

[179]*179Judgment — Nothing erroneous. This is a debt contracted before the war; although the security was renewed since, yet debts are the object of the statute; had the note been renewed since the statute was made, the case would hare been otherwise; but it was given when no such statute was thought of by the people in general. The debt now belonging to the heir makes no difference.

This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court o£ Errors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[179]*179Judgment — Nothing erroneous. This is a debt contracted before the war; although the security was renewed since, yet debts are the object of the statute; had the note been renewed since the statute was made, the case would hare been otherwise; but it was given when no such statute was thought of by the people in general. The debt now belonging to the heir makes no difference.

This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court o£ Errors.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borland-v-sharp-connsuperct-1790.