Borland v. Sharp

1 Root 178

Opinion

Judgment — Nothing erroneous. This is a debt contracted before the war; although the security was renewed since, yet debts are the object of the statute; had the note been renewed since the statute was made, the case would hare been otherwise; but it was given when no such statute was thought of by the people in general. The debt now belonging to the heir makes no difference.

This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court o£ Errors.