Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.

Seventh Circuit

Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.

228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 8, 1915·No. No. 2139·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree adjudging that appellant’s patent, No. 940,300, November 16, 1900, for a safety deposit box lock, was not infringed by the locks used by appellee. In our judgment the two locks, as fully described and explained in Judge Sanborn’s opinion in 212 Fed. 178, differ so radically in their structural laws that the case was properly disposed of by the finding of noninfringement. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree adjudging that appellant’s patent, No. 940,300, November 16, 1900, for a safety deposit box lock, was not infringed by the locks used by appellee. In our judgment the two locks, as fully described and explained in Judge Sanborn’s opinion in 212 Fed. 178, differ so radically in their structural laws that the case was properly disposed of by the finding of noninfringement. The decree is affirmed.

Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co., 228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077 (7th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

228 F. 1019 (Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related