Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.

Seventh Circuit

Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.

228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 8, 1915

DocketNo. 2139

StatusPublished

This text of 228 F. 1019 (Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co., 228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077 (7th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree adjudging that appellant’s patent, No. 940,300, November 16, 1900, for a safety deposit box lock, was not infringed by the locks used by appellee. In our judgment the two locks, as fully described and explained in Judge Sanborn’s opinion in 212 Fed. 178, differ so radically in their structural laws that the case was properly disposed of by the finding of noninfringement. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree adjudging that appellant’s patent, No. 940,300, November 16, 1900, for a safety deposit box lock, was not infringed by the locks used by appellee. In our judgment the two locks, as fully described and explained in Judge Sanborn’s opinion in 212 Fed. 178, differ so radically in their structural laws that the case was properly disposed of by the finding of noninfringement. The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borland-v-northern-trust-safe-deposit-co-ca7-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack