Borkowski v. Bacon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Borkowski v. Bacon

259 A.D. 997, 21 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 997 (Borkowski v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borkowski v. Bacon, 259 A.D. 997, 21 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty doEars costs and disbursements, and motion granted: No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’MaEey, Townley, Cohn and CaEahan, JJ. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc., AppeEant, v. Albbecht’s Retail Stobbs, Inc., and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting in addition to the items allowed, [998]*998items 1 to 4, and discovery and inspection accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with, twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty doEars costs and disbursements, and motion granted: No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’MaEey, Townley, Cohn and CaEahan, JJ. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc., AppeEant, v. Albbecht’s Retail Stobbs, Inc., and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting in addition to the items allowed, [998]*998items 1 to 4, and discovery and inspection accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with, twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 997, 21 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borkowski-v-bacon-nyappdiv-1940.